Long-term support of COVID-19 patients with veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: Complications, predictors of mortality and long-term outcome

Objectives: Treatment of severe respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) due to COVID-19 by veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) had a mortality of up to 70% in Germany. Many patients with COVID-19 need VV-ECMO support longer than 28 days (long-term VV-ECMO). Evidence on mortality, complications during intensive care, functional status after discharge and mortality-predictors for patients supported with long-term VV-ECMO is lacking. Method(s): Retrospective study of 137 consecutive patients treated with VV-ECMO for ARDS due to COVID-19 at University Hospital Regensburg from March 2020 to March 2022. Result(s): 38% (n=52;87% male) of patients needed longterm VV-ECMO support. In these, SOFA score (median [IQR]) at ECMO initiation was 9 [8-11], age 58.2 [50.6- 62.5] years, PaO2/FiO2-ratio 67 [52-88] mmHg, pCO262 [52-74] mmHg, Murray-Score 3.3 [3.0-3.6] and PEEP 15 [13 - 16] cmH2O. Duration of long-term support was 45 [35-65] days. 26 (50%) patients were discharged from the ICU. Only one patient died after hospital discharge. At VVECMO initiation, baseline characteristics did not differ between deceased and survivors. Complications were frequent (acute kidney injury: 31/52, renal replacement therapy: 14/52, pulmonary embolism: 21/52, intracranial hemorrhage 8/52, major bleeding 34/52 and secondary sclerosing cholangitis: 5/52) and more frequent in the deceased. Karnofsky index (normal 100) after rehabilitation was 70 [57.5-82.5]. Twelve of the 18 patients discharged from rehabilitation had a satisfactory quality of life according to their own subjective assessment. Four patients required nursing support. Mortality-predictors within the first 30 days on VV-ECMO only observed in those who deceased later, were: Bilirubin >5mg/dl for > 7 days, pulmonary compliance <10ml/mbar for >14 days, and repeated serum concentrations of interleukin 8 >150ng/L. Conclusion(s): Long-term extracorporeal lung support in patients with COVID-19 resulted in 50 % survival and subsequently lead to a satisfactory quality of life and functionality in the majority of patients. It should preferably be performed in experienced centers because of a high incidence of complications. Several findings during the early course were associated with late mortality but need validation in large prospective studies.

Differences in nosocomial infections in patients on VV-ECMO for COVID-19 and influenza

Objectives: In COVID-19 associated acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) requiring VV-ECMO, ventilator-associated-pneumonia (VAP), pulmonary aspergillosis and viral reactivations are observed frequently, but there is only little knowledge on incidence, onset and causative pathogens. This study analyzes frequency of VAP, pulmonary aspergillus infections, and viral reactivations in a large cohort of patients with ARDS treated with VV-ECMO due to either COVID-19 or Influenza. Method(s): Retrospective analysis of all consecutively patients at the University Hospital Regensburg requiring VVECMO due to COVID-19 (March 2020 and May 2022) or Influenza (May 2012 and December 2022). VAP was diagnosed according to current guidelines. Pulmonary Aspergillosis met criteria of probable COVID-associated Aspergillosis according to current guidelines. Result(s): 147 patients (age (median [IQR]) 55.3 [48.7 - 61.7], SOFA at VV-ECMO initiation 9 [8 - 12], 23 [14 - 38] days on VV-ECMO) suffering from COVID-19 and 72 influenza patients (age 55.3 [46 - 61.3], SOFA at VV-ECMO initiation 13 [10 - 15], 16 [10 - 23] days on VV-ECMO) were included in the analysis. Pulmonary superinfections were more frequent in COVID-19 than in influenza (VAP: 61% vs. 39%, pulmonary Aspergillosis: 33% vs. 22%, CMV reactivation: 19% vs. 4%, HSV reactivation: 49% vs. 26%.) The first episode of VAP in COVID-19 and Influenza was detected 2 days [1 - 15] after and 1 day (-3 - 22) before ECMO initiation, respectively. First VAP-episode in COVID-19 were mainly caused by Klebsiella spp. (29%,), Staphylococcus aureus (27%) and E. coli (11%). Further VAP-episodes (30% in COVID-19) and relapses of VAP were mainly caused by Klebsiella spp. (53%, 64%, respectively). In Influenza, VAP was mainly caused by Staphylococcus aureus (28%) and Streptococcus pneumoniae(28%), further VAP episodes were not observed. Conclusion(s): Superinfections were common in patients treated with VV-ECMO and occur more frequently in COVID-19 ARDS compared to Influenza. VAP occurs early and may significantly contribute to the need of VV-ECMO. Therefore, a meticulous routine microbiologic workup is advisable. The observed differences in the spectrum of secondary infectious agents in COVID19 compared to Influenza are not understood yet.

Coronavirus disease 2019 is associated with multi-lineage, morphologic changes in peripheral blood cells

Introduction: The clinical course of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) varies from mild symptoms to acute respiratory distress syndrome, hyper-infammation and coagulation disorder. The hematopoietic system plays a critical role in the observed hyperinfammation, particularly in severely ill patients. Method(s): We conducted a prospective diagnostic study performing a blood differential analyzing morphologic changes in peripheral blood of COVID-19 patients. COVID-19 associated morphologic changes were defned in a training cohort and subsequently validated in a second cohort (n=45). Morphologic aberrations were further analyzed by electron microscopy (EM) and fow cytometry of lymphocytes was performed. Result(s): We included 45 COVID-19 patients in our study (median age 58 years;82% on intensive care unit). The blood differential showed a specific pattern of pronounced multi-lineage aberrations in lymphocytes (80% of patients) and monocytes (91%). 84%, 98%, and 98% of patients exhibited aberrations in granulopoiesis, erythropoiesis and thrombopoiesis, respectively. Electron microscopy revealed the ultrastructural equivalents of the observed changes and confrmed the multi-lineage aberrations already seen by light microscopy. Conclusion(s): The morphologic pattern caused by COVID-19 is characteristic and underlines the serious perturbation of the hematopoietic system. We defned a hematologic COVID-19 pattern to facilitate further independent diagnostic analysis and to investigate the impact on the he-matologic system during the clinical course of COVID-19 patients.

Recommendations for treatment of critically ill patients with COVID-19 : Version 3 S1 guideline.

Since December 2019 a novel coronavirus (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, SARS-CoV-2) has rapidly spread around the world resulting in an acute respiratory illness pandemic. The immense challenges for clinicians and hospitals as well as the strain on many healthcare systems has been unprecedented.The majority of patients present with mild symptoms of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); however, 5-8% become critically ill and require intensive care treatment. Acute hypoxemic respiratory failure with severe dyspnea and an increased respiratory rate (>30/min) usually leads to intensive care unit (ICU) admission. At this point bilateral pulmonary infiltrates are typically seen. Patients often develop a severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).So far, remdesivir and dexamethasone have shown clinical effectiveness in severe COVID-19 in hospitalized patients. The main goal of supportive treatment is to ascertain adequate oxygenation. Invasive mechanical ventilation and repeated prone positioning are key elements in treating severely hypoxemic COVID-19 patients.Strict adherence to basic infection control measures (including hand hygiene) and correct use of personal protection equipment (PPE) are essential in the care of patients. Procedures that lead to formation of aerosols should be carried out with utmost precaution and preparation.

[Epidemiology of SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19]. / Epidemiologie von SARS-CoV-2/COVID 19: Aktueller Stand.

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a beta coronavirus, which first appeared in 2019 and rapidly spread causing a worldwide pandemic. Here we present a nonsystematic review of the current knowledge on its epidemiological features. The SARS-CoV­2 replicates mainly in the upper and lower respiratory tract and is mainly transmitted by droplets and aerosols from asymptomatic and symptomatic infected subjects. The estimate for the basic reproduction number (R0) is between 2 and 3 and the median incubation period is 6 days (range 2-14 days). Similar to the related coronaviruses SARS and Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS), superspreading events play an important role in spreading the disease. The majority of infections run an uncomplicated course but 5-10% of those infected develop pneumonia or a systemic inflammation leading to hospitalization, respiratory and potentially multiorgan failure. The most important risk factors for a complicated disease course are age, hypertension, diabetes, chronic cardiovascular and pulmonary diseases and immunodeficiency. The current infection fatality rate over all age groups is between 0.5% and 1% and the rate rises after the sixth decade of life. Nosocomial transmission and infections in medical personnel have been reported. A drastic reduction of social contacts has been implemented in many countries with outbreaks of SARS-CoV­2, leading to rapid reductions in R0. Most interventions have used bundles and which of the measures have been more effective is still unknown. Using mathematical models an incidence of 0.4%-1.8% can be estimated for the first wave in Germany.

COVID or not COVID: attributing and reporting cause of death in a community cohort.

OBJECTIVES: In Germany, deaths of SARS-CoV-2-positive persons are reported as 'death related to SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19' to the Robert Koch Institute, Germany's main infectious disease institution. In 177 COVID-19-associated deaths reported in Regensburg, Germany, from October 2020 to January 2021, we investigated how deaths following SARS-CoV-2 infection were reported and whether cases with a death attributed to SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19 death [CD]) differed from cases with a reported death from other causes (non-COVID-19 death [NCD]). STUDY DESIGN: This was an observational retrospective cohort study. METHODS: We analysed descriptive data on the numbers of cases, deaths, age, sex, symptoms and hospitalizations. We calculated odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) and performed Chi-squared/Fisher's exact test for categorical variables and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test for comparison of medians. RESULTS: Deaths attributed to COVID-19 occurred primarily in elderly patients. The mortality rate and the case fatality ratio (CFR) increased with age. The median age and the prevalence of risk factors were similar between CD and NCD. Respiratory symptoms and pneumonia at the time of diagnosis were associated with death reported as CD. The odds of CD attribution in cases hospitalized because of COVID-19 were 6-fold higher than the odds of NCD (OR: 6.00; 95% CI: 1.32 to 27.22). CONCLUSIONS: Respiratory symptoms/pneumonia at the time of diagnosis and hospitalization due to COVID-19 were associated with attributing a death to COVID-19. Numbers of COVID deaths need to be interpreted with caution. Criteria that facilitate attributing the cause of death among SARS-CoV-2 cases more uniformly could make these figures more comparable.

Comparison of Throat Washings, Nasopharyngeal Swabs and Oropharyngeal Swabs for Detection of SARS-CoV-2

Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) RNA is detected by reverse-transcription quantitative real-time PCR (RT-qPCR) from respiratory specimens. This study compares throat washings (TW), nasopharyngeal swabs (NS) and oropharyngeal swabs (OS). A total of 102 samples from 34 adult patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection were analysed by RT-qPCR with absolute quantification. The median concentrations and diagnostic sensitivities were 5.8x104 copies/mL, 85% (NS), 1.4x104, 79% (OS) and 4.3x103, 85% (TW). Concentration differences were significant between NS and TW (P = 0.019). Saliva (SA) was available from 21 patients (median 3.4x103). OS and TW can be considered for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostics, although with slightly lower concentrations.

[The outbreak of COVID-19 in China]. / Der Ausbruch von COVID-19 in China.

The transmission dynamics of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in Wuhan and Hubei Province differ considerably from those in the rest of China. In Hubei province SARS-CoV­2 led to a dramatic outbreak. Intensive control measures (travel restrictions, isolation of cases, quarantine of contacts and others) led to the control of the outbreak. Despite travel restrictions SARS-CoV­2 was detected in other provinces in the following weeks. Consistent and intensive identification and isolation of infected persons ("containment") was able to prevent an outbreak outside Hubei province, providing an example for the control of SARS-CoV­2.

[Epidemiology of SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19]. / Epidemiologie von SARS-CoV-2-Infektion und COVID-19.

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a new ß­Coronavirus that was first detected in 2019 in Wuhan, China. In the ensuing months it has been transmitted worldwide. Here the authors present the current knowledge on the epidemiology of this virus. SARS-CoV­2 replicates mainly in the upper and lower respiratory tract and is primarily transmitted by droplets from asymptomatic and symptomatic infected subjects. The estimate for the basic reproduction number (R) is currently between 2 and 3, while the incubation period is 6 (median, range 2-14) days. Although most infections are uncomplicated, 5-10% of cases develop pneumonia, which can lead to hospitalization, respiratory failure and multiorgan failure. Risk factors for a complicated disease course include age, hypertension, chronic cardiovascular and pulmonary disease and immunodeficiency. The overall case fatality rate is 1.4%, with the rate rising in the sixth decade of life. Nosocomial and infections in medical personnel have been reported. Drastic reductions in social contact have been implemented in many countries with outbreaks of SARS-CoV­2, leading to rapid reductions in R. Which of the measures have been effective is still unknown.